On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 11:34:26AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > James Laska (jlaska@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > I'm not in favor of this criteria addition at this time. I'd love to > > see this happen, but I don't think it's realistic at this stage in the > > release or in this forum (F-14). Can we have more input from devel + > > rel-eng who initially proposed the change? > > I'd be willing to extend/change this such that: > > - Trees are tested for broken dependencies > - All broken dependencies are filed > - These tickets are attached to the nice-to-have tracker > > We can work towards the point where the third bullet here is changed > to 'the blocker tracker', but if we can't do that now, I would still > like to *track* the problem. This seems like an excellent compromise to me, and we should pursue a more stringent requirement for F15 if people are amenable to that. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ Where open source multiplies: http://opensource.com -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
