On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 17:21 +0200, MichaÅ Piotrowski wrote: > It seemed to me that preupgrade process should not require any user > interactions. I've used this tool twice on this system and I do not > recall that I had to provide any user input. Preupgrade should, preupgrade itself is the tool that prepares the system for an upgrade. But preupgrade should prepare a system that performs an unattended upgrade. From what I can tell, all indications are that was what was happening, and then the system was rebooted. > > or was > > still in the middle of performing package upgrade %scripts and rebooted. > > Maybe. However, it seems to me that the update of 420 packages should > not take so long. That's why I turned off the box. Again, just my best guesses based on your logs. The best way to find out is to actively monitor the upgrade process first-hand. > Unfortunately, on my laptop virtualization is not working too fast, so > it'll not check whether preupgrade actually works well. But maybe > someone else will find the time to check. > > Thanks for your analysis. Anytime, thanks for sharing your experiences and logs! Thanks, James
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
