On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 12:55 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 11:34:26AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > James Laska (jlaska@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > > I'm not in favor of this criteria addition at this time. I'd love to > > > see this happen, but I don't think it's realistic at this stage in the > > > release or in this forum (F-14). Can we have more input from devel + > > > rel-eng who initially proposed the change? > > > > I'd be willing to extend/change this such that: > > > > - Trees are tested for broken dependencies Should be covered using existing tests called out in the installation matrix (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test). > > - All broken dependencies are filed > > - These tickets are attached to the nice-to-have tracker See below ... > > We can work towards the point where the third bullet here is changed > > to 'the blocker tracker', but if we can't do that now, I would still > > like to *track* the problem. > > This seems like an excellent compromise to me, and we should pursue a > more stringent requirement for F15 if people are amenable to that. Agreed, this is definitely manageable for F-14 using Adam's NTH (nice-to-have) draft tracking process. We talked about some additional test activities to run in parallel with this Thursday's planned Acceptance test run [1]. Filing bugs for all repoclosure [2] and conflicts [3] seems like a good fit. I'll add this to my list and communicate results later this week. Thanks, James [1] http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-14/f-14-quality-tasks.html [2] https://fedorahosted.org/pipermail/autoqa-results/2010-October/043253.html (x86_64) and https://fedorahosted.org/pipermail/autoqa-results/2010-October/042847.html (i386) [3] https://fedorahosted.org/pipermail/autoqa-results/2010-October/042709.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
