On 9/12/2010 12:34 AM, Phil Savoie wrote: > On 12/09/10 12:09 AM, David wrote: >> On 9/11/2010 11:44 PM, Jonathan Kamens wrote: >>> On 09/11/2010 11:27 PM, David wrote: >>>> Wow! That is a large number of problems. Perhaps if you go away again >>>> and then come back in, say, another month or two, perhaps three, these >>>> problems will be all be worked out by others that actually do the >>>> testing and everything will be to your liking. >>> David, I've been one of the people "that actually do the testing" for >>> many years. >>> >>> There are 1,085 bugs at bugzilla.redhat.com that were reported by me. >>> It's probably not true any more, but at one point I had reported more >>> bugs against Red Hat Linux (take note, before Fedora existed) than >>> anyone who wasn't an employee of Red Hat. >>> >>> I don't know whether you report bugs into bugzilla under multiple email >>> addresses, but if not, then I note with some interest that, in contrast, >>> there are a grand total of /four/ bugs in bugzilla reported by >>> dgboles@xxxxxxxxxx >>> >>> I have a "Red Hat Beta Team" T shirt. Do you? Just curious. >>> >>> It is also worth noting that many of the bugs I've reported have patches >>> attached to them... also submitted by me. >>> >>> It is hard for me to imagine a scenario in which your response to me is >>> appropriate or one in which you are someone who in a position to >>> legitimately speak to me that way. Frankly, that would be true if my >>> previous message was the first I'd ever sent to this mailing list and I >>> had never submitted a bug to bugzilla. There is nothing to gain from >>> responding with such rudeness and hostility to legitimate feedback. >>> >>> I hope you can pry your foot out of your mouth for long enough to >>> apologize to the entire list for the way you just spoke to me. If not, I >>> will have no choice but to defend myself on the list by resending this >>> message to it rather than privately to you. I'd imagine that an >>> apparently unsolicited apology from you for speaking inappropriately to >>> someone who was trying to help would be a lot less humiliating to you >>> than for everyone to see this message. >>> >>> Jonathan Kamens >>> >> >> A personal email that complains of my 'attack'? :-) You, personally, >> perhaps did not deserve what I considered as a satirical reply to a >> 'whine' type post. That was the impression that I got from your post. A >> 'whine'. >> >> I will accept your claim of a long history as a tester on your word. Why >> not since I don't really care? As well as your claim of a long history >> as a bug reporter. Again why not since I don't really care? >> >> I can understand that these supposed problems are important to you. >> Notice the 'to you'. But since no one else seems to have reported them >> just how would you expect that these might have been fixed when only you >> seem to have these problems and you have: >> >> /quote/ >> >> (I've been unsubscribed for a month or so because of other business >> consuming all my time, so forgive me if I'm beating a dead horse.) >> >> /unquote/ >> >> But you are correct. I should have just ignored your 'whine' post. >> >> Fair enough? >> >> Have a nice day. > > I wonder, when going through doorways, David, if you have a hard time > scraping what appears to be a very large head without doing damage to > your ears? > > Jonathan was right your answer was entirely inappropriate. > > > Have a nice day. Why thanks. You have one too Phil. -- David -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
