On 12/09/10 12:09 AM, David wrote: > On 9/11/2010 11:44 PM, Jonathan Kamens wrote: >> On 09/11/2010 11:27 PM, David wrote: >>> Wow! That is a large number of problems. Perhaps if you go away again >>> and then come back in, say, another month or two, perhaps three, these >>> problems will be all be worked out by others that actually do the >>> testing and everything will be to your liking. >> David, I've been one of the people "that actually do the testing" for >> many years. >> >> There are 1,085 bugs at bugzilla.redhat.com that were reported by me. >> It's probably not true any more, but at one point I had reported more >> bugs against Red Hat Linux (take note, before Fedora existed) than >> anyone who wasn't an employee of Red Hat. >> >> I don't know whether you report bugs into bugzilla under multiple email >> addresses, but if not, then I note with some interest that, in contrast, >> there are a grand total of /four/ bugs in bugzilla reported by >> dgboles@xxxxxxxxxx >> >> I have a "Red Hat Beta Team" T shirt. Do you? Just curious. >> >> It is also worth noting that many of the bugs I've reported have patches >> attached to them... also submitted by me. >> >> It is hard for me to imagine a scenario in which your response to me is >> appropriate or one in which you are someone who in a position to >> legitimately speak to me that way. Frankly, that would be true if my >> previous message was the first I'd ever sent to this mailing list and I >> had never submitted a bug to bugzilla. There is nothing to gain from >> responding with such rudeness and hostility to legitimate feedback. >> >> I hope you can pry your foot out of your mouth for long enough to >> apologize to the entire list for the way you just spoke to me. If not, I >> will have no choice but to defend myself on the list by resending this >> message to it rather than privately to you. I'd imagine that an >> apparently unsolicited apology from you for speaking inappropriately to >> someone who was trying to help would be a lot less humiliating to you >> than for everyone to see this message. >> >> Jonathan Kamens >> > > A personal email that complains of my 'attack'? :-) You, personally, > perhaps did not deserve what I considered as a satirical reply to a > 'whine' type post. That was the impression that I got from your post. A > 'whine'. > > I will accept your claim of a long history as a tester on your word. Why > not since I don't really care? As well as your claim of a long history > as a bug reporter. Again why not since I don't really care? > > I can understand that these supposed problems are important to you. > Notice the 'to you'. But since no one else seems to have reported them > just how would you expect that these might have been fixed when only you > seem to have these problems and you have: > > /quote/ > > (I've been unsubscribed for a month or so because of other business > consuming all my time, so forgive me if I'm beating a dead horse.) > > /unquote/ > > But you are correct. I should have just ignored your 'whine' post. > > Fair enough? > > Have a nice day. I wonder, when going through doorways, David, if you have a hard time scraping what appears to be a very large head without doing damage to your ears? Jonathan was right your answer was entirely inappropriate. Have a nice day. Phil -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
