On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 14:47 -0400, James Laska wrote: > > I was just trying to cover the possibilities. For me, the appearance of > > a graphical menu is really a polish issue and doesn't fit well with > > Alpha, it seems more suited to Beta or Final. But the practical element > > is whether the boot-to-the-installer process actually works, no matter > > what you see in the meantime. For me the loss of the other options on > > the menu isn't really critical until beta, but the install process > > should at least start if you just boot and wait at Alpha stage. > > > > It may be too much effort to draw this distinction, though, in which > > case we may as well go with #1. > > Yeah, definitely #1. I have gone ahead and added this criterion to the F14 Alpha criteria: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_14_Alpha_Release_Criteria#Alpha_Release_Requirements > > > Another thought, I recall there was some debate about adding release > > > criteria for the artwork. Would it make sense to rephrase the second > > > point to something more specific to Fedora artwork? [1] > > > > For me that's *definitely* a final release polish issue. I don't think > > we can really say we want to delay the Alpha or even Beta release simply > > for an old wallpaper on the bootloader menu, can we? > > No, I wouldn't argue this as a Alpha (or possibly Beta) criteria. I > only meant to suggest that it could be combined with something more > generic about artwork for the release. Like you point out above, it > feels more like a polish issue. Much like many of the artwork issues > (not meant to diminish their contribution, only that they are not > required for proper function). We should probably start a new thread to discuss what polish criterion / criteria we want to add. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
