On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 12:04 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 14:47 -0400, James Laska wrote: > > > > I was just trying to cover the possibilities. For me, the appearance of > > > a graphical menu is really a polish issue and doesn't fit well with > > > Alpha, it seems more suited to Beta or Final. But the practical element > > > is whether the boot-to-the-installer process actually works, no matter > > > what you see in the meantime. For me the loss of the other options on > > > the menu isn't really critical until beta, but the install process > > > should at least start if you just boot and wait at Alpha stage. > > > > > > It may be too much effort to draw this distinction, though, in which > > > case we may as well go with #1. > > > > Yeah, definitely #1. > > I have gone ahead and added this criterion to the F14 Alpha criteria: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_14_Alpha_Release_Criteria#Alpha_Release_Requirements Thanks for clarifying, I've added this as one expected result in boot method tests[1]. Cheers, Hurry [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Installer_Boot_Methods -- Contacts Hurry FAS Name: Rhe Timezone: UTC+8 TEL: 86-010-62608141 IRC nick: rhe #fedora-qa #fedora-zh -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
