On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 08:35 -0700, Matt McCutchen wrote: > On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 09:17 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > > It seems bodhi is abused more than I thought. [...] > > Why does bodhi allow editing of the package version? It seems that field > > should be locked from editing and the only course of action would be to > > delete the update and create a new one. > > I went down this path a while ago and was told to chill and let > maintainers use Bodhi however they wish: > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-April/134671.html > > > Another alternative would be to > > have bodhi modified to reset karma points if the package field changes. > > Yes, that seems like an obvious change. Some related tickets: > > https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/388 > https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/413 I believe this is the intended future fix. As Matt says, we've been on this trip before. =) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
