Hi all, It seems bodhi is abused more than I thought. Over the past few releases of being a part-QAer for stable Fedora releases, I've noticed a trend of packagers editing updates rather drastically. Take a recent example with perl[1]. I left positive karma on perl-5.10.1-115.fc13, but then the packager edited the update with a *new* copy of the package: perl-5.10.1-116.fc13. The problem? My karma is still giving this *new* update a positive point. What if the patches added totally destroyed perl's ability to work correctly? I would look like an idiot for giving it positive karma -- except only I know that this package's release changed. The same thing happened with the wine-1.2[2] update as each Release Candidate of wine was released under the same bodhi update. Why does bodhi allow editing of the package version? It seems that field should be locked from editing and the only course of action would be to delete the update and create a new one. Another alternative would be to have bodhi modified to reset karma points if the package field changes. I realize everyone has their work cut out for them, but this seems like a serious issue. What are your thoughts? [1] http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-5.10.1-116.fc13 [2] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wine-1.2.0-1.fc13 -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
