On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 02:57 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Christopher Beland wrote: > > Perhaps it would be advantageous for BugZappers to have a goal of > > triaging all bugs marked "urgent" in Bugzilla relatively quickly. This > > is the easiest way for bug reporters to flag possible blockers, > > especially the inexperienced and those who only have Bugzilla accounts. > > (It also provides quicker help to the people who are most upset about > > the bug they have reported.) There are currently 116 "urgent" bugs in > > the "NEW" state, though only 11 are in Rawhide. > > Unfortunately, what the reporter considers "urgent" is often not what we > consider urgent. True, but it's better than a kick in the teeth. Remember we're talking about using it as a cue for triagers, not for developers. Even though reporters sometimes just have an overinflated sense of the importance of their own bug, it's _generally_ not a bad idea for triagers to at least take a look at bugs that reporters have categorized highly before looking at others. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
