Hi, guys. This is me, not working. ;) I just had a great chat with fcami on IRC, and all sorts of interesting issues came up. One I definitely want to focus on, though, is release-critical bugs. He suggested that there may not be a definitely release-critical bug process for Fedora releases. This struck me as highly worrying. What I mean by a process is this: * There should be a release_critical status in Bugzilla that is respected. A new Fedora release should not be made unless all release_critical bugs are (ideally) fixed or at least specifically addressed in some way (I can provide more details on that later). * There should be a group that is recognized as being in charge of release_critical bugs. They arbitrate what is release_critical and what is not, and they track this on a weekly or daily basis (depending where we are in the release schedule) and co-ordinate with RelEng on getting the bugs fixed. Is this, currently, the case? If not, what is the release-critical process? What do you guys think about this? Should we have a process? Should it be as I described? Who should be in charge? (I would say -bugzappers). Thanks! -- adamw -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
