On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 09:33 -0800, John Poelstra wrote: > Jesse Keating said the following on 02/11/2009 09:21 AM Pacific Time: > > On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 09:18 -0800, John Poelstra wrote: > >> Nothing is worse than spending several hours triaging bugs to a blocker > >> list only to find out that the blocker list isn't being used or that the > >> release has been deemed "done enough" and has gone to the mirrors. I > >> know every bit helps, but it is still demoralizing. > > > > While I agree to an extent, just because we chose not to fix the bug > > before the release, doesn't mean that the bug shouldn't be fixed. The > > efforts put in won't be in vain at all, it just may take a little bit > > more time before the return on investment. > > > > > > My core issue is not knowing a decision has been made about the quality > of a release and how that decision was arrived at. We talk a lot about > transparency in decision making in Fedora. I think it applies here too :) > > John I'll also note that being head-down working on a bug and missing an IRC conversation is not that far off from being head-down working on a bug and missing an email that went by (: -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
