On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Mads Kiilerich <mads@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Scott Robbins wrote, On 11/16/2008 05:18 PM: >> >> On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 04:30:33PM +0100, Mads Kiilerich wrote: >> >>> >>> 64 bit machine or Flash 9? >>> http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/f10preview/en_US/What_is_the_Latest_on_the_Desktop.html#sn-Web_browsers >>> >> >> I just looked at the release notes, and it's really quite unclear. >> "If you are using Flash 10, you do not need libflashsupport anymore as >> the usage of ALSA has been fixed in this version. >> "Users of Fedora x86_64 must install the nspluginwrapper.i386 package to >> enable the 32-bit Adobe Flash Player plug-in in Firefox, and the >> libflashsupport.i386 package to enable sound from the plugin." >> ^^^^^^^^ >> >> So, is it needed or not? > > I thought it was clear but hard to read: That libflashsupport isn't > "generally" (ie on i386) needed, but on 64-bit it is however still needed. NO, its *NOT* needed. -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
