On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 04:30:33PM +0100, Mads Kiilerich wrote: > 64 bit machine or Flash 9? > http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/f10preview/en_US/What_is_the_Latest_on_the_Desktop.html#sn-Web_browsers > I just looked at the release notes, and it's really quite unclear. "If you are using Flash 10, you do not need libflashsupport anymore as the usage of ALSA has been fixed in this version. "Users of Fedora x86_64 must install the nspluginwrapper.i386 package to enable the 32-bit Adobe Flash Player plug-in in Firefox, and the libflashsupport.i386 package to enable sound from the plugin." ^^^^^^^^ So, is it needed or not? According to a brief test I made yesterday, it may not be. I removed libflashsupport with yum remove on a 64 bit install and sound was fine. -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6 Xander: So, we Bronzin' it tonight? Willow: Wednesdays, kinda beat... Xander: Well, we could grind our enemies into talcum powder with a sledgehammer, but, gosh, we did that last night. -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list