On Sun, 16 Nov 2008, drago01 wrote:
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Mads Kiilerich <mads@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Scott Robbins wrote, On 11/16/2008 05:18 PM:
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 04:30:33PM +0100, Mads Kiilerich wrote:
64 bit machine or Flash 9?
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/f10preview/en_US/What_is_the_Latest_on_the_Desktop.html#sn-Web_browsers
I just looked at the release notes, and it's really quite unclear.
"If you are using Flash 10, you do not need libflashsupport anymore as
the usage of ALSA has been fixed in this version.
"Users of Fedora x86_64 must install the nspluginwrapper.i386 package to
enable the 32-bit Adobe Flash Player plug-in in Firefox, and the
libflashsupport.i386 package to enable sound from the plugin."
^^^^^^^^
So, is it needed or not?
I thought it was clear but hard to read: That libflashsupport isn't
"generally" (ie on i386) needed, but on 64-bit it is however still needed.
NO, its *NOT* needed.
Tell that to my system. :-) On my F10 x86_64 system, audio does not work
without it. I know what the docs say but...
The problem for me is I am not sure what to file a bug against. Suggestions?
Regards,
--
Tom Diehl tdiehl@xxxxxxxxxxxx Spamtrap address mtd123@xxxxxxxxxxxx
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
