Re: Flash support [branched fromRe: F10 on Homebuilt Box - Absolutely Brutal...!!!!]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 06:50:14PM +0100, drago01 wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Mads Kiilerich <mads@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Scott Robbins wrote, On 11/16/2008 05:18 PM:
> >>
> >> On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 04:30:33PM +0100, Mads Kiilerich wrote:
> >>
> > I thought it was clear but hard to read: That libflashsupport isn't
> > "generally" (ie on i386) needed, but on 64-bit it is however still needed.
> 
> NO, its *NOT* needed.

Yup you are correct, it is NOT needed.  (As per follow-up email, which
should appear before this one, I've added my comments to yours and Mads'
on the bug report.)
> 

-- 
Scott Robbins
PGP keyID EB3467D6
( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 )
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6

Spike: A slayer with family and friends. That sure as hell wasn't
in the brochure. 

-- 
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux