On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 06:50:14PM +0100, drago01 wrote: > On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Mads Kiilerich <mads@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Scott Robbins wrote, On 11/16/2008 05:18 PM: > >> > >> On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 04:30:33PM +0100, Mads Kiilerich wrote: > >> > > I thought it was clear but hard to read: That libflashsupport isn't > > "generally" (ie on i386) needed, but on 64-bit it is however still needed. > > NO, its *NOT* needed. Yup you are correct, it is NOT needed. (As per follow-up email, which should appear before this one, I've added my comments to yours and Mads' on the bug report.) > -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6 Spike: A slayer with family and friends. That sure as hell wasn't in the brochure. -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
