Re: F9beta update takes forever

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rahul Sundaram wrote:
John Summerfield wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
John Summerfield wrote:


Thanks Will.
According to the second, it defaults to "all" which I think means "worst" or "bloated":-)

This was before the change has been made. The current default is best as Will Woods explained.

That is not the behaviour I saw.

Then you must have been using a older version of yum. This is a relatively recent change.

Rahul



[root@potoroo ~]# grep yum /var/log/yum.log | tail
Apr 07 09:21:39 Updated: yum-packagekit-0.1.11-1.fc9.x86_64
Apr 09 09:57:11 Installed: yum-3.2.14-2.fc9.noarch
Apr 09 10:04:03 Erased: yum-basearchonly
Apr 24 00:41:27 Updated: yum-3.2.14-10.fc9.noarch
Apr 24 00:42:45 Updated: yum-packagekit-0.1.12-4.20080416git.fc9.x86_64
Apr 27 19:22:00 Updated: yum-packagekit-0.1.12-7.20080425.fc9.x86_64
[root@potoroo ~]#

Somewhere after Apr 09 10:04:03 Erased: yum-basearchonly I got some .i386 packages installed.

The link Will mentioned described the behaviour I saw.
--

Cheers
John

-- spambait
1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  Z1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- Advice
http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375

You cannot reply off-list:-)

--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux