On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 01:51:41PM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > Michal Jaegermann wrote: > > > At least if I interpret correctly what > > I was told some time ago nspluginwrapper.x86_64 only does not > > make any sense. > > You interpret incorrectly. nspluginwrapper for your native arch > only still provides the feature of running all plugins in a > separate process/address-space, so a plugin crash won't take down > your browser with it. OK, so I was misinformed. I asked that question some time ago, when I was trying initial releases of ndiswrapper, and it seems to me that one of answers I got at that time at least implied that I need both. I cannot find it quickly now, though. Also relatively recently somebody was complaining about a flak from mozilla-plugin-config when only nspluginwrapper.x86_64 was present. Michal -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
