On Sun, 2008-04-06 at 12:41 -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > I am not sure but this may be even deliberate. > Is libflashsupport.x86_64 used only by flash-plugin.i386 from > Adobe? If yes that this would even made sense. Yes, it's for adobe flash, which only comes i386. Sadly this is one of those cases where we want libflashsupport there by default so that it works when you install adobe flash (and we can't control their rpm to add a requires on it), but also it has to be of the right arch, so now we've got a bad situation. I'm going to talk to warren tomorrow and try to get this fixed so that we're not forcing i386 packages onto people who really don't need/want them on their x86_64 systems. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
