On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 04:32:52PM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Sun, 2008-04-06 at 12:41 -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > > I am not sure but this may be even deliberate. > > Is libflashsupport.x86_64 used only by flash-plugin.i386 from > > Adobe? If yes that this would even made sense. > > I'm going to talk to warren tomorrow and try > to get this fixed so that we're not forcing i386 packages onto people > who really don't need/want them on their x86_64 systems. If libflashsupport.x86_64 is only needed by flash-plugin.i386, and not by (say) swfdec.x86_64, then ensuring that all required support is installed sounds like a good idea. OTOH I would think that a requirement in nspluginwrapper.x86_64 which pulls in nspluginwrapper.i386, and indirectly all other i?86 libraries needed with it, would be quite a bit more clear and in a better place. Michal -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
