On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 11:10:23PM -0400, Chris Ricker wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Apr 2008, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
>
> > is installed sounds like a good idea. OTOH I would think that a
> > requirement in nspluginwrapper.x86_64 which pulls in
> > nspluginwrapper.i386, and indirectly all other i?86 libraries needed
> > with it, would be quite a bit more clear and in a better place.
>
> Not a better place -- wanting flash.i386 isn't the only reason people
> install nspluginwrapper.x86_64
That is precisely why this is a better place. As you say -
a need for nspluginwrapper may have nothing to do with flash
so libflashsupport is a wrong place for making this somewhat
coherent.
Michal
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
