> On 2/25/08, Alan <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> > the context here might make this question inappropriate, but i >> > installed f9 alpha inside virtualbox in two different ways, with only >> > one difference -- whether the all-encompassing root file system was >> > encrypted or not. >> > >> > within virtualbox, the encrypted VM is *waaaaay* slower than the >> > unencrypted one. should i expect the same performance difference >> with >> > regular hard disk installs? just curious. i expected a difference >> > but this is *hugely* noticeable and almost unusable. >> >> That sounds like an artifact of virtualbox. I am using full disk >> encryption on F9 alpha and I am seeing little, if any, slowdown. Maybe >> 64-bit helps. > > Same here, on i686. As a side note, I have run VMWare with and without the hardware virtualization. It DOES make a difference. I do not know if VirtualBox uses the hardware virtualization. If it does not, it should. -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
