On 2/25/08, Alan <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > the context here might make this question inappropriate, but i > > installed f9 alpha inside virtualbox in two different ways, with only > > one difference -- whether the all-encompassing root file system was > > encrypted or not. > > > > within virtualbox, the encrypted VM is *waaaaay* slower than the > > unencrypted one. should i expect the same performance difference with > > regular hard disk installs? just curious. i expected a difference > > but this is *hugely* noticeable and almost unusable. > > That sounds like an artifact of virtualbox. I am using full disk > encryption on F9 alpha and I am seeing little, if any, slowdown. Maybe > 64-bit helps. Same here, on i686. Jeff -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
