> > the context here might make this question inappropriate, but i > installed f9 alpha inside virtualbox in two different ways, with only > one difference -- whether the all-encompassing root file system was > encrypted or not. > > within virtualbox, the encrypted VM is *waaaaay* slower than the > unencrypted one. should i expect the same performance difference with > regular hard disk installs? just curious. i expected a difference > but this is *hugely* noticeable and almost unusable. That sounds like an artifact of virtualbox. I am using full disk encryption on F9 alpha and I am seeing little, if any, slowdown. Maybe 64-bit helps. What kind of processor are you using? Does it have the hardware virtualization extensions? -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
