the context here might make this question inappropriate, but i
installed f9 alpha inside virtualbox in two different ways, with only
one difference -- whether the all-encompassing root file system was
encrypted or not.
within virtualbox, the encrypted VM is *waaaaay* slower than the
unencrypted one. should i expect the same performance difference with
regular hard disk installs? just curious. i expected a difference
but this is *hugely* noticeable and almost unusable.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry:
Have classroom, will lecture.
http://crashcourse.ca Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
========================================================================
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
