Hi
Thats too generic. Is all of the software thats available in core
needed to be installed simultaneously and is using all of them
together a common scenario?
You(Rahul) still don't get it! It's not about "using them all
together" at all. Yes, it is about installing "everything" in Core at
one time(install time!) *easily*. It's a usability / easy-of-use
issue. It's about giving users the choice. If they want to - let then.
Choice has associated cost. Implementing everything any user ever asked
for will lead to a unmaintainable mess.
Report number?
Search on "anaconda everything".
Thats not a number ;-)
And what makes Rahul think he knows the difference better than
others? (wink,wink)
Oh please guys. Listen before responding. I presented very detailed
reasons why I think it is not a good thing.
And all those reasons are bogus and do not apply to the usability/ease
of use of the package selection part of the installer.
Sure. Call them all bogus with no explanation. That doesnt look a
appealing argument.
Several people have already given you "use cases" but this is not
about your opinion that an "everything" install is not useful.
Can you list them?
It's about those users that want to do it (in spite of your opinion)
being able to do it easily. Trying to make it difficult is just
arrogance!
Depends on what you want to do and how useful it is. I still havent
heard good use cases yet.
--
Rahul
Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list