On 1/22/06, gb spam <gbofspam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > We value everything installs, it works for us and jumping > through hoops (write web apps; managing kickstart files; using > kickstart during installs - does it still not tell you if it can't > load the ks file until you get to a point in the install where your > options haven't been selected?) is "less convenient" than clicking a > check box during install. So let me get this straight.. nothing other than a single check box during install is going to satify you? There is no room to compromise? You've drawn the line in the sand and you are holding your breath? That's unfortunate. Some of us, are working with the maintainers to identify which packages are not incorporated into the comps grouping structure correctly so that the functionality of the install all button will essentially be duplicate by selecting all displayed packages in all displayed groups during the install process. However since you aren't interested in anything but the single button solution, and aren't interested in helping with the comps membership organization( which also has value during post-install for finding and removing applications) I won't invite you to help with https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174244. -jef -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list