Re: FC5T2 ready for even a test release?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/22/06, gb spam <gbofspam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> We value everything installs, it works for us and jumping
> through hoops (write web apps; managing kickstart files; using
> kickstart during installs - does it still not tell you if it can't
> load the ks file until you get to a point in the install where your
> options haven't been selected?) is "less convenient" than clicking a
> check box during install.

So let me get this straight.. nothing other than a single check box
during install is going to satify you?  There is no room to
compromise? You've drawn the line in the sand and you are holding your
breath?  That's unfortunate.

Some of us, are working with the maintainers to identify which
packages are not incorporated into the comps grouping structure
correctly so that the functionality of the install all button will
essentially be duplicate by selecting all displayed packages in all
displayed groups during the install process.  However since you aren't
interested in anything but the single button solution, and aren't
interested in helping with the comps membership organization( which
also has value during post-install for finding and removing
applications) I won't invite you to help with
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174244.

-jef

-- 
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]