On Wed, 2005-20-04 at 09:55 -0400, Alan Cox wrote: > On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 03:02:12PM -0700, Mike Bird wrote: > > Would you care to offer any reasons as to why Lilo should or should not > > be available during Fedora and RHEL installations? > > Its unmaintained GRUB Legacy = ditto. > Its obsolete GRUB Legacy = ditto. > Nobody in Red Hat tests/qa's it >From what I can tell, it is the FC users who are supposed to QA GRUB Legacy patches, for RHEL. > We can use the disk space for real packages Like what, a single 640x480 wallpaper? > Its more productive to fix grub than import prehistoric baggage like lilo Ahh, so it is more productive to patch the heck out of a package that is not even maintained by the original developers. > lilo doesn't understand file system layouts > etc Who cares, as long as it works.