Re: FC4t2 no good without LILO

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2005-04-14 at 12:25 -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
> Paul,
> 
> LILO is still the primary boot-loader on your system.  The characters
> 'LILO' show that LILO is still in both MBR's.  Grub did not install to
> the MBR's as you and I both observed in our respective tests.  LILO is
> handling the boot on your system and then chaining to Grub.

Oh really?  So how in the world did LILO get setup to chain to grub with
out me EVER setting up any such configuration?  Magic?  After
running /sbin/lilo:

va:root:502)# od -c /dev/sda | head -1
0000000 372 353   |   l   b   a   L   I   L   O 001  \0 025 004   $  \0
va:root:503)# od -c /dev/sdb | head -1
0000000 372 353   |   l   b   a   L   I   L   O 001  \0 025 004   $  \0

After running '/sbin/grub-install /dev/md0'

va:root:505)# od -c /dev/sda | head -1
0000000 353   H 220   l   b   a   L   I   L   O 001  \0 025 004   $  \0
va:root:506)# od -c /dev/sdb | head -1
0000000 353   H 220   l   b   a   L   I   L   O 001  \0 025 004   $  \0


>   I warned
> you last night that you might have to do an install from the grub
> command line.

  Which would not have tested at all what I was trying to test.



-- 
-Paul Iadonisi
 Senior System Administrator
 Red Hat Certified Engineer / Local Linux Lobbyist
 Ever see a penguin fly?  --  Try Linux.
 GPL all the way: Sell services, don't lease secrets


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]