On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:06 AM Mark Pearson <markpearson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 21/01/2021 10:46, Mohan Boddu wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 3:30 PM Adam Williamson > > <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> Yeah, I don't think that should be really tricky for anyone. I'd > >> suggest we just run it as a post-release nightly compose rather than a > >> candidate and don't give it any kind of label. I don't think it should > >> be hard for releng to run that, > > > > Yes, RelEng can create a live media with updates repo included, it > > wont be a huge deal and we can sign the checksums manually making it > > official. But I notice that the cadence hasn't been finalized yet, I > > would really appreciate if we know how often do we have to run this, I > > understand it is subjected to change, but having a schedule really > > helps. > > > From Lenovo perspective we'd like the image now (or next week) ready for > the 2021 Carbon. If there was a blocker issue then running it again > would be useful (but so far test results are good and I'll know in the > next couple week(ish) if there are any red flags. I will start building an image asap, expect something by the end of the day today (hopefully). > > We have some other platforms that come out later in the year with Fedora > - around the end of the summer. Last year because of various things it > worked out really well that we were ready for testing just as F33 > released so we of course used that. I'm focusing right now on improving > how we get our releases out much more quickly (now I know where many of > the issues lie) so I'm not sure everything will line up quite as well, > and that's probably worthy of discussion. Is it better to have the new > Fedora out but a later release of a platform? Or earlier HW with older > Fedora? Generally the biggest criticisms I get are cost (whether I have > no control over) and release dates after Windows (where we have sucked > and I have lots of scope for improvement). > > Sorry - long answer to say "once or at worst twice a year" Thank you very much Mark, once or twice a year is gonna be fine for us. > > >> and I should be able to run openQA > >> tests and even create a validation event if necessary, I might need to > >> metaphorically whang a few things with a hammer because it won't quite > >> fit the normal flows but it shouldn't be a big deal. > >> > >> Also, I forgot to mention it'll obviously be completely impossible for > >> this to work without Lenovo shipping me some hardware for, > >> uh...testing. Yup. That's definitely non-negotiable. Two of everything. > >> :D > > > > I hope one of them is for RelEng or else it will be three of everything :D > I have noted the request ;) Hehe :) > > Mark > _______________________________________________ > test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
