On Sat, 2019-10-26 at 08:15 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > On 10/20/19 10:59 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Sun, 2019-10-20 at 06:56 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > > > On 10/18/19 2:31 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: > > > > On 10/18/19 2:05 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > I might need more logs from your case to be sure of what's going on - > > > > > if you could put the dnf logs and system journals up somewhere it'd > > > > > help. Also, did you re-run the download phase after updating the > > > > > system-upgrade plugin? You do need to do that... > > > > Yes, I ran "dnf system-upgrade clean" as well as "dnf clean packages" for good measure. > > > > > > > > > The change I put in last week fixes the case I diagnosed, but I mean > > > > > it's still possible there's some other case where the transactions come > > > > > up different for sure. Will need data to figure it out though. > > > > OK.... > > > > > > > > journal is at https://drive.google.com/open?id=1qCUyZcC5-QjE83uh9p5wC10tIai1PCO2 > > > > dnf log is at https://drive.google.com/file/d/1K17NzRLf8e945kQ1gHKdlFqi2v87IpQb/view?usp=sharing > > > > > > > And for the record I have added to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758588 > > Sorry Ed, got sidelined by other stuff. But I need the dnf log from the > > download transaction as well, to compare the two. Can you find that one > > too? Thanks! > > As you know, I did supply the requested logs in the BZ. > > The issue I reported seems either not to have been considered or is irrelevant to 178588. It's definitely not the *same* as that bug, because it involves a package that the download transaction omits but the upgrade transaction decides to 'reinstall'. To figure it out we'd need to figure out why the update transaction decides that package needs to be reinstalled, I guess, but I did not have time to do that last week; f31 blockers took higher priority. > So, I think others may encounter the same issue. Should a new BZ be created? Or, will > there be an advisory to erase the offending packages and manually reinstall after the upgrade > completes? Filing a new bug wouldn't hurt, for sure. Thanks. Probably against dnf- plugins-extras . -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
