On 10/17/19 4:16 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Almost there.... But the problem may not be a "fedora" problem?
2019-10-17T23:09:44Z CRITICAL Error opening file for checksum:
/var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade/rpmfusion-free-058b175644bc1430/packages/rpmfusion-free-appstream-data-30-1.20181021.fc30.noarch.rpm
2019-10-17T23:09:44Z CRITICAL Package
"rpmfusion-free-appstream-data-30-1.20181021.fc30.noarch" from
repository "rpmfusion-free" has incorrect checksum
2019-10-17T23:09:44Z CRITICAL Error opening file for checksum:
/var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade/rpmfusion-nonfree-c253272f7b309f17/packages/rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data-30-1.20181021.fc30.noarch.rpm
2019-10-17T23:09:44Z CRITICAL Package
"rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data-30-1.20181021.fc30.noarch" from
repository "rpmfusion-nonfree" has incorrect checksum
2019-10-17T23:10:11Z DDEBUG Cleaning up.
Those referenced files do not exist.
That is the symptom of the problem. Did you get the updated plugin?
One thing I wondered is what would happen if you manually added the
"missing" rpms to the cache directory after the regular download process
was complete. It should work.
One very odd thing here though is that it's looking for fc30 packages.
Maybe there is an rpmfusion problem as well since there is no appstream
data past 30 yet.
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
