On 10/18/19 7:49 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 10/17/19 4:16 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Almost there.... But the problem may not be a "fedora" problem?
2019-10-17T23:09:44Z CRITICAL Error opening file for checksum: /var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade/rpmfusion-free-058b175644bc1430/packages/rpmfusion-free-appstream-data-30-1.20181021.fc30.noarch.rpm
2019-10-17T23:09:44Z CRITICAL Package "rpmfusion-free-appstream-data-30-1.20181021.fc30.noarch" from repository "rpmfusion-free" has incorrect checksum
2019-10-17T23:09:44Z CRITICAL Error opening file for checksum: /var/lib/dnf/system-upgrade/rpmfusion-nonfree-c253272f7b309f17/packages/rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data-30-1.20181021.fc30.noarch.rpm
2019-10-17T23:09:44Z CRITICAL Package "rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data-30-1.20181021.fc30.noarch" from repository "rpmfusion-nonfree" has incorrect checksum
2019-10-17T23:10:11Z DDEBUG Cleaning up.
Those referenced files do not exist.
That is the symptom of the problem. Did you get the updated plugin? One thing I wondered is what would happen if you manually added the "missing" rpms to the cache directory after the regular download process was complete. It should work.
Yes. Got that and did the module reset.
python3-dnf-plugin-system-upgrade-4.0.7-1.fc30.noarch
One very odd thing here though is that it's looking for fc30 packages. Maybe there is an rpmfusion problem as well since there is no appstream data past 30 yet.
Yes, that oddity has me questioning where the problem lies.
--
The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions.
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
