I like the general idea of the original draft, but I would go for a simpler route: bugs not nominated as a blocker by the scheduled start of the Go/No-Go meeting are subject to not being considered for blocking the release.
This gives us the flexibility to make the best judgment call that we can. It doesn't prevent us from treating it as a blocker, but it also doesn't require us to. I don't think we need to lawyer it any more than that (even though I personally enjoy rules lawyering), because if we can't trust ourselves to make the best decision, then we have bigger problems already.
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
_______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
