On Mon, 2016-09-26 at 11:13 +0530, Kanika Murarka wrote: > Sumantro and me were working upon the possibility of shifting QA > tickets to some other platform like pagure. Thanks Justin(jflory7) for > guiding . > Following are the points:- > 1. Shifting to Pagure will be easy and efficient. > 2. Wiki -----> overview > 2. In the Pagure repo, priorities can be set for tickets based on > ranking, e.g. 10=urgent,20=high,30=normal, etc.(we can have custom > priorities) > 3. Milestones----> Pagure milestones(has been improved) > 4. Roadmap > *All the ticket with the tag roadmap will show up on the roadmap page. > *For each milestones defined in the settings of the project, the > roadmap will group tickets with the corresponding tag. > *Tickets with the tag roadmap that are not associated with any of the > milestones defined in the settings are group in an unplanned section. > > 5. All of the fields in both ticket type and ticket component are > likely best implemented in tags for tickets. That would allow for the > categorization and grouping of the tickets based on their keywords. > 6. The blocked by and blocking feature is available in Pagure as metadata. > 7. All other things can be easily implemented using tags. > 8. As discussed in the last meeting, https://pagure.io/pagure-importer > can be used to import tickets. > > I am putting this as a mail because, I wont be able to attend the meeting today. This all seems fine to me, and now F25 is past would be a great time to do it. I've seen some other projects are able to do a 'test' import into a disposable or playground Pagure instance, like https://stg.pagure.io/ ; could we set up a test migration of fedora-qa trac to see how it would look? Thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
