On Tue, 2016-12-06 at 09:20 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > So an alternative to kparal's scheme would be to try and consider this, > and say we test: > > * Workstation live > * Everything netinst > * Server DVD Or we could simply state that required coverage is 'one release- blocking live, one release-blocking netinst, one release-blocking DVD image', without specifying which ones precisely. That gives a bit more flexibility and is easier to write. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
