On Thu, 2016-11-24 at 13:23 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 09:44:31AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > I'm rather confused by the thread you're replying to, though. I don't > > see how any of it makes an awful lot of sense. If the case is starting > > from a single installed kernel, how is increasing the > > 'installonly_limit' going to change anything? And if dnf didn't want to > > remove the kernel that the user was at the time of running (I assume) > > `dnf system-upgrade download` using successfully, how exactly would > > letting it remove an older(?) kernel have 'led to disaster'? Did you > > remove some important earlier context? > > Full thread for context: https://da.gd/Idg3 Oooh. PAE. You shoulda said. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333591 It got closed, but I don't think the fix was sent to anything before Rawhide. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
