On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 09:44:31AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > I'm rather confused by the thread you're replying to, though. I don't > see how any of it makes an awful lot of sense. If the case is starting > from a single installed kernel, how is increasing the > 'installonly_limit' going to change anything? And if dnf didn't want to > remove the kernel that the user was at the time of running (I assume) > `dnf system-upgrade download` using successfully, how exactly would > letting it remove an older(?) kernel have 'led to disaster'? Did you > remove some important earlier context? Full thread for context: https://da.gd/Idg3 There's some other oddity involved, where it's trying to install the *base* (non-updated) kernel from F24 over an updated F23, and then it says those kernels conflict rather than installing them in parallel. > dnf is supposed to have a protection which prevents it removing the > currently-running kernel. If that's somehow being omitted for system- > upgrade, that's certainly a bug. That _possibly_ is the case here. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
