On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Per Bothner <per@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 11/17/2016 12:14 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: >> >> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 9:27 PM, Per Bothner <per@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 11/16/2016 09:09 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Per Bothner <per@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Otherwise, the install (Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-25-1.3.iso) went >>>>> very smoothly. The "media test" failed, but booting into safe mode and >>>>> installing to hard disk was otherwise smooth. > > >>>> How did you create the media? There are several ways the media test >>>> can be thwarted depending on how it's created; either dd or >>>> mediawriter methods should result in valid media or it's probably a >>>> bug somewhere - my first guess is bad flash. >>> >>> >>> Two different flash drives two different iso's: >>> I first tried Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-25_Beta-1.1.iso on one flash >>> drive, >>> and a different flash drive, then I tried >>> Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-25-1.3.iso >>> in the first drive. Same result for all of them. >> >> >> OK you didn't answer the question. Those are file names. How did you >> put the files onto the flash drives? > > > Sorry - I meant to say I used Fedora Media Writer (on F24). Hmm that's been tested quite a bit the last two cycles. I'd sooner expect two USB flash drives have bad cells resulting in corruption on reads than a write corruption bug in mediawriter itself. -- Chris Murphy _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
