Re: Installation validation test change proposal: merge USB tests into 'default boot and install', add more environment columns

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 6:47 AM, Richard Ryniker <ryniker@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>an optical specific Live Workstation spin
>
> Sounds like the proper category: will not block a regular Fedora release,
> will not consume test resources for primary Fedora deliverables, and will
> provide a focus for those with some stake in optical media.
>
> While lack of community to support an "optical spin" may not mean there
> are few who want it, it would mean there are insufficient people who will
> invest their talent to create it.

All Fedora ISO's start out as ISO 9660, with El Torito extensions
added; and GRUB 2 and ISOLINUX to boot UEFI and BIOS systems
respectively. The ISO 9660 and El Torito parts are probably pretty
statically reliable. The gotcha comes from the ever changing
bootloaders, and there are two of them. Even if we standardized on one
of them, they're in effect two still, because BIOS and UEFI systems
use completely different binary files and boot mechanisms following
the El Torito part that enables discovery of the bootloader. So the
bottom line is, if we want optical to work, it has to be tested.
*shrug* Otherwise there's a chance we run into bugs like this [1]
which is an bug only affecting boot when the ISO image is burned onto
actual physical optical media, the problem doesn't happen with the
same image written to USB sticks.

Bolted onto that however, isohybrid adds an MBR, and then also a GPT
and APM (yes no kidding three partitions) are added. This is how we
boot Macs from optical or USB sticks, and everything else BIOS or UEFI
from USB sticks. This is for x86_64, I'm not sure what other archs'
ISO's look like.

Is there a less fragile way to do all of this? *shrug* It's a very
delicately, and eyebrow raising, balanced boat. Maybe the strongest
argument for thinning the heard of parts on these ISOs is, it'd be
easier to modify a single partition map to bring about persistence to
the USB stick, but that just makes us trade problems we know for
problems we don't know. There's no net increase in stability,
probably.


[1]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148087


-- 
Chris Murphy
_______________________________________________
test mailing list -- test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux