On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 07:29 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote: > > > > releng flipped any necessary switches for > > 'release' behaviour. > I think this is the only meaningful argument for having TC/RC > distinction. Personally I'm fine with it both ways. It's nice to see > which images are the ones "almost ready", but I'm not sure it's worth > having more bits for releng to remember and flip. > > > > > > > > > > > TC's > > > alpha-0.1 > > > alpha-0.2 > > > alpha-0.3 > > > alpha-0.4 > > > beta-0.1 > > > beta-0.2 > > > beta-0.3 > > > RC-0.1 > > > RC-0.2 > > > > > > legit RC's > > > alpha-1.1 > > > alpha-1.2 > > > alpha-1.3 > > > alpha-1.4 > > > beta-1.1 > > > beta-1.2 > > > beta-1.3 > > > RC-1.1 > > > RC-1.2 > If we keep the TC/RC separation, I like the approach above. > > > > > > > I think this still works a bit better if we add a 'Final' milestone > > rather than using the 'RC' milestone, but yeah, this isn't bad. > "Final" would be nice. So just as an update on this: Dennis and I had a chat about it this morning, and it's difficult to be totally sure how we want to handle it ahead of time, so for now we're inclined to keep it as simple as possible. I'm going to file a request for an Alpha 'candidate' and suggest it simply be labelled Alpha-1.1 , and we're going to work on the assumption we will ditch the TC/RC distinction at least so far as compose creation goes. We'll do Alpha-1.1, Alpha-1.2, Alpha-1.3 and so on, without worrying about the TC/RC distinction. At least that's the initial plan - once we've actually done a couple of composes and seen what exactly comes out of the sausage machine, and we've tried to set up validation events for them and seen how it works for real testing, we can see if anything didn't turn out too well and needs to change. For now I'm inclined to similarly try and keep the validation stuff as simple as possible, so I won't try to recreate the 'TC' / 'RC' distinction at the validation event level, but instead the events will follow the Pungi compose versioning quite closely, so we'll have something like Test Results:Fedora 24 Alpha 1.1 Installation . If that seems terrible to anyone, please yell now. :) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
