On Mon, 2016-02-29 at 05:28 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote: > > > > > For example logout is necessary if you want to switch languages (and > > > our l10n test days rely on that). Reboot and shutdown is necessary > > > for automating stuff. I'd use the same measure as in post-install > > > here. > > Hmm, IIRC this was one case that *really happened*, and I was trying to > > catch the flavor of our IRC discussion at the time - my memory is that > > we were willing to accept such bugs as blockers, but we'd maybe be more > > likely to waive them for only affecting a small amount of users or > > being workaroundable or something like that. > If the explanation sounds like this, I'm actually very OK with that > :) I'd probably avoid saying "less important", because then it sounds > like an advice to waive everything. I think it's equally important, > it just has different use cases. Maybe we could say something like "a > slightly different standard of judgement may be applied to > conditional violations in live environments, as the use cases of live > systems and installed systems are not the same". For example, if > shutdown didn't work properly and on some systems actually caused > restart, that could be seen as a lesser problem on Lives. OK, I've added another sentence to the footnote to try and clarify this some more. Good to go now? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
