On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 7:23 PM, Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > And as I said to otherChris, 'without open > discussion' is just plainly false. There's a ton of 'open discussion', > spread across three mailing lists. That's confused. On devel@ the discussion was about the original change feature. On anaconda-devel@ there was really no meaningful discussion, because there was no acknowledgement of dissenting opinions let alone addressing them with exactly why this is necessary on Fedora and apparently nowhere else. On test@, 100% of the discussion happened after we were informed of the change, which is in the very first sentence of the first email in this thread. Ton no. Modicum perhaps. >You could also, of course, wait more than > one lousy day to give the devs a chance to reply before whipping up a > storm of righteous indignation, but so often that seems too much to > ask? You mean like the reply you got after suggesting a secret cmdline option to make this requirement go away while testing so that you don't go crazy? That was 13 days ago. -- Chris Murphy -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
