Once upon a time, Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said: > It's not actually something that is part of the Change's scope, but an > alternative way to try and achieve the same goal: the overall thought > process was "well, what the Change proposer really wants is to reduce > the likelihood of compromise via password access to the root account, So, why didn't this change have to go through a proposal? The original change was rejected (which should show there is disagreement about this), so such a change should not just be pushed without open discussion. If there is disagreement about this change, is there no recourse? Or do anaconda devs get to determine system policy now on their own? -- Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx> -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
