On Thu, 2014-11-06 at 11:18 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Perhaps something where each product's metadata defines the environment > groups to include the appropriate fedora-release-<foo> package, but the > environment groups in the general case *don't*? Not sure that's possible, > and it might lead to other issues. I put a concrete proposal in my bug report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160917 "For a 'proper' solution, I'm thinking perhaps we need to extend comps a bit (more). Perhaps environment groups need a <release> or <product> property, which defines the fedora-release-(product) package/group that's associated with that environment; anaconda and yum would then install the <product> package/group for an environment *only if no other product package/group was already installed/selected for installation*, or something like that." -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
