On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 10:20 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > There is a "Fedora Workstation" but that can't be installed due to.... I have a similar issue actually, but the other way around: Fresh F21 beta workstation install. I tried to install KDE using dnf, but fedora-release-workstation and fedora-release-nonproduct conflict. If I try to remove fedora-release-workstation, dnf replaces it with fedora-release-server which gets me back to the same state really. Is it impossible to install other DEs along the workstation at the moment using dnf? > [asinha@localhost ~]$ sudo dnf remove > fedora-release-workstation > Dependencies resolved. > ================================================================================================================ > Package Arch > Version Repository Size > ================================================================================================================ > Installing: > cockpit x86_64 > 0.27-1.fc21 fedora 342 k > cockpit-assets noarch > 0.27-1.fc21 fedora 920 k > fedora-release-server noarch > 21-0.16 fedora 19 k > firewalld-config-server noarch > 0.3.12-1.fc21 fedora 45 k > libssh x86_64 > 0.6.3-3.fc21 fedora 150 k > python-futures noarch > 2.1.6-3.fc21 fedora 34 k > rolekit noarch > 0.1.0-2.fc21 fedora 99 k > storaged x86_64 > 0.3.1-1.fc21 fedora 92 k > Removing: > fedora-release-workstation noarch > 21-0.16 @System 1.0 k > firewalld-config-workstation noarch > 0.3.12-1.fc21 @System 1.0 k > > Transaction Summary > ================================================================================================================ > Install 8 Packages > Remove 2 Packages > > Total download size: 1.7 M > Is this ok [y/N]: > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ I'm assuming yum shell should be able to help here, but dnf doesn't have such a feature yet - I also don't expect a normal end user to resort to yum shell. Do the different fedora-release-* packages have to conflict? Can't I be running a workstation product and a server product and miscellaneous bits (a union, rather than the current apparent mutual exclusion)? This must've been discussed before, I just can't find the discussion. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
