Re: Proposing new dual booting release criteria

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sep 10, 2014, at 1:25 PM, Tom Horsley <horsley1953@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, 10 Sep 2014 15:16:18 -0400
> Gene Czarcinski wrote:
> 
>> Personally, I do not use os-prober and prefer to create 
>> /etc/grub.d/40_custom files which use configfile to "chain-load" other 
>> configuration files.
> 
> Me too, which is why I really really wish I could tell anaconda
> to create the grub2 directory and cfg file, but not try to actually
> install grub and screw around with the MBR and such.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886502

Skip the 35 comments. The first two lines of the description contain the entire point. All that needs to happen for bootloader=no is insert '--grub-setup=/bin/true' as an option for grub2-install. It's actually simplifying the code path than what we currently have because everything else stays exactly the same as when bootloader=yes; and --grub-setup=/bin/true is the upstream recommended practice for this use case. So it's already well tested.

It really can be fixed for Fedora 21. We know what fix is needed, and it's safe. So someone who cares about this, who knows a bit of python, should put together a patch per this:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Anaconda/ReviewProcess

And then also propose that bug for Fedora 21 beta freeze exception. It's virtually certain it'd pass. I mean, it probably could be incorporated without a freeze exception if it goes in before beta freeze (?) but then at least it's on a list and has some extra attention. It's a 2 year old bug, let's squash it.




Chris Murphy
-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux