On Sun, 2014-08-31 at 18:29 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > > Note that we're heavily dependent on upstream code, here - we basically > > farm the bootloader detection of other OSes out to grub2, which is what > > other distros do as well. We probably all act fairly similarly here, > > these days. /etc/grub.d/30_os-prober is what does most of the magic. > > This is why I'd draw the line on owning our code. The two cited bugs are congruent with this. > > > A more feasible criterion, for me, would be something like 'successful > > dual boot with default single-disk install of other Fedora versions and > > other "major" distributions', however we choose to define major exactly. > > That may even be too broad. Keeping it narrow to "we're responsible > for what our code does different than upstream" So I'm kinda pulled in two different directions on this - I like the concept of only owning responsibility for our own code, but on the other hand I also like *functional* release criteria. So it's a bit of a tricky circle to square. I'm sure we can figure something out, though! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
