Re: Very rough storage validation matrix draft

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2014-03-13 at 19:50 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:

> I need to read back over all the feedback this got when I first put it
> up, but for now, I looked back over the draft, and I think one small
> change is all it actually needs, but the implications change:
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_storage_matrix

> What does everyone think? Thanks!

Thanks for all the feedback to this post! I've gone through the feedback
so far, made a few tweaks, and done some work to clean up the 'device
tests' - I created some templates for those test cases and edited the
test cases to use the templates where possible, and be as close as
possible where they have to diverge. I created the 'virtio device' test,
too:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_install_to_virtio_device .

Still got more work to do on this - haven't taken care of RAID yet -
just reporting progress. Help welcome!
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
test mailing list
test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux