On Wed, 2014-03-26 at 16:35 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2014-03-13 at 19:50 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > I need to read back over all the feedback this got when I first put it > > up, but for now, I looked back over the draft, and I think one small > > change is all it actually needs, but the implications change: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_storage_matrix > > > What does everyone think? Thanks! > > Thanks for all the feedback to this post! I've gone through the feedback > so far, made a few tweaks, and done some work to clean up the 'device > tests' - I created some templates for those test cases and edited the > test cases to use the templates where possible, and be as close as > possible where they have to diverge. I created the 'virtio device' test, > too: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_install_to_virtio_device . > > Still got more work to do on this - haven't taken care of RAID yet - > just reporting progress. Help welcome! I have now created the 'guided' test cases, using a set of templates in order to try and retain consistency. I've converted the matching existing test cases into redirects to the new-style ones. I also did a bit of rearranging of the new matrices based on things that came up while writing the test cases. At this point I think we're pretty close to covering everything that needs to be covered at least for the 'pre-Alpha' testing we're thinking of doing, and Alpha itself. I'll probably draft up a modified validation matrix with this new-style storage stuff included somehow or other tomorrow, and we can see how that looks. Thanks, folks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
